The house organ for the Council of Foreign Relations, Foreign
Affairs, has published its final solution under the title: "Print Less
and Transfer More: Why Central Banks Should Give Money directly to the
People." Written under the names Mark Blyth and Eric Lonergan, but
trumpeting the establishment voice of, say, Martin Wolf, they state: "It's
well past time, then, for U.S. policymakers - as well as their counterparts in
other developed countries - to consider a version of Friedman's
helicopter drops.... Many in the private sector don't want to take out any more
loans; they believe their debt levels are already too high. That's especially
bad news for central bankers: when households and businesses refuse to rapidly
increase their borrowing, monetary policy can't do much to increase their
spending.... Governments must do better. Rather than trying to spur
private-sector spending through asset purchases or interest-rate changes,
central banks, such as the Fed, should hand consumers cash directly.... The
transfers wouldn't cause damaging inflation, and few doubt that they would
work. The only real question is why no government has tried them."
This is a fairly standard view
among celebrity economists these days, possibly worth commemorating since
the CFR has joined the deluge, although, there are adult members of the CFR who
should denounce this position. Money printing by Bernanke and kin has
been ad hoc from the beginning, as the ecstatic and clairvoyant
Bürgermeisteramt made clear when ZIRP besotted the world (see: "Meet
Your Investment Manager").
That
"few doubt [handing out money] would work" is true within academia
and has-been institutions. History has recorded the contrary. Chase van der
Roehr, writing in the August 19, 2014, edition of Bloomberg Briefs, noted
"it now takes $37,403 added to the Fed's balance sheet to stimulate the
creation of a new job. That number stood at $7,600 in August 2008 and has
deteriorated steadily ever since."
The
median new job pays much less, so the $37,403-to-1 ratio, after being adjusted
for a constant quality, is infinite. "[F]ew doubt that they would
work" since those polled are entirely ignorant of all but each others'
opinions.
Printing
money has never worked, the grander the scale the worse the calamity. The
French state in 1790 was falling deeper into debt. The Assembly first
confiscated Church property, found itself deeper in debt, authorized a 400
million assignat print, with a pledge that no more currency would be
issued. The poor grew poorer, starved, and cries of "We need more
money!" elicited another 800 million assignats. This ended in
collapse, including the redemptive pleasure of Assemblymen rolled on tumbrels
through the streets of Paris to their end.
Germany
in the early 1920s suffered central banker Rudolf Haverstein's delusion. As
jobs disappeared along with food, Haverstein worked the presses to death.
(Ludwig von Mises recalled hearing "the heavy drone of the Austrian Bank's
printing presses which were running incessantly day and night to produce new
bank notes in Vienna." Austria was following Germany's lead; a temptation
it still suffered from in the 1930s.)
The historian Alan Bullock wrote: "[The
inflation] had the effect, which is the unique quality of economic catastrophe,
of reaching down and touching every single member of the community in a way in
which no political event can. The savings of the middle classes and working
classes were wiped out at a single blow with a ruthlessness which no revolution
could ever equal..."
Today, Japan's fascinating yen-printing
campaign imitates the same blue print. It is ending with the people unable to
pay for food; or much else; Nissan, Toyota, and Honda moving to Mexico; so
eliciting hysterical government responses. Bloomberg reporter Katsuyo Kuwako
captured the moment in "Japanese Women Armed with Chainsaws Head to the
Hills under Abe's Plan." Kuwako reported Comrade "Junko Otsuka quit
her job in Tokyo and headed for the woods, swapping a computer for a bush
cutter and her air-conditioned office for the side of a mountain. She was part
of a new wave of women taking forestry jobs, the result of economic, social and
environmental policies sprouting in Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's Japan.
Otsuka... said she's fine with the 20 percent pay cut to be the first female
logger at Tokyo Chainsaws.... [Abe] set a goal of... revitalizing regional
economies and enhancing women's roles."
Adam Posen -
Heavyweight Inflationist |
Japanese economic policy is dictated from the
United States. Maybe it should not be a surprise to read Junko's elation at a
20% pay cut to "[enhance] women's roles." After all, somehow the
Conference Board was able to report U.S. consumer confidence is at a
seven-year-high on August 26, 2014. Adam Posen, quad-author along with Ben S.
Bernanke of Inflation Targeting: Lessons from the International Experience,
is truly a man of the moment as money experiments go extraterrestrial. Posen
was quoted in "We Are
All Lab Rats Now" featured in "May
2014: Crematorium" (earlier visage and caption thrown in
for free). Lord Circumference harassed Financial Times readers in March
with his Trotskyite reforms in Japan: "Increasing female labour
force participation is the right priority for structural reform. At least three
million women who could work are neither in employment nor looking for a job. A
few million more are squandering their capabilities in limited
roles...."
|
||
Repeating the conclusion of
"Meet Your Investment Manager," this crowd has so bungled every
decision the possibility rises that a run-for-the-exits will be halted by
markets being closed. If so, that would be trial-and-error too, as we saw in
2008. It is important to develop a strategy that can respond as circumstances
change to preserve assets.
No comments:
Post a Comment